Basit Iqbal's interview: Thinking about Method (2017)

Basit Kareem Iqbal's interview with Talal Asad got published in Qui Parle

Read it here.

Do Muslims Belong in the West? An Interview with Talal Asad

From Jadaliyya, 2.3.2015

In this discussion, Talal Asad identifies the problematic ways in which the presence of Muslim communities in Western contexts has been characterized in response to outbreaks of violence such as the recent events in Paris. Asad argues that many of the critiques to which Muslims are subjected, namely their dependence on transcendent forces, also inhabit the intellectual assumptions of secular and atheist commentators.  He further expresses the need to examine Islam as a "tradition" in order to avoid precisely the types of sweeping generalizations and focus instead on the complexities and particularities of the various ways in which Islam is lived. The inability to historicize Islam as a tradition has played into the calls for a "reform" of the religion and resulted in the inability to confront the underlying causes of the recent eruptions of violence. This interview was conducted in New York on 17 January 2015. It was later transcribed for publication. 

Hasan Azad (HA): Do Muslims belong in the West? This is a question that has been asked for many years, but perhaps with no more force than today. You wrote in your essay “Muslims as a ‘Religious Minority’ in Europe” (2003), over a decade ago, that “Muslims as Muslims cannot be represented in Europe.” Is there something almost inevitable in the way “the clash of civilizations” is being set up by certain sectors in the West?

Talal Asad (TA): No, I do not think there is such a thing as a “clash of civilizations.” When I said that Muslims as Muslims cannot be represented in the West, I was being ironic, and also referring to the fact that ninety percent of the time when people talk about “the problem of Muslims” in the West, it is to complain about the fact that Muslims have not “integrated.” There is very little serious discussion about what it means to be “European,” what it means to be French, or British, or whatever, and what exactly “secularism” in Europe means for religion in general and Islam in particular. The problem is always seen as, either: We must try harder to integrate them, or: It is their fault they do not integrate, and it is because they are attached to an illiberal religion, and so to values that conflict profoundly with our secular, egalitarian society.

In other words, the problem is seen as a matter of why “they” do not fit in to what is thought of as “our” society, rather than: What or who are “we,” as Europe or as France or Britain, and what must we do to change aspects of ourselves in order to make it possible for Muslims (who will also need to change) to be represented in Europe as Muslims? The problem is always seen as one of assimilating Muslims into Europe (whose structure and identity are fixed) if we are well intentioned towards them, and if you are not well intentioned, then making it quite clear that they do not belong with us–that they ought to “go back to where they came from.” Europe in the sixteenth century was not what it is like today–indeed, it was not even “Europe” but “Christendom.” Even after the forces of secularization things did not remain the same–politically, economically, or culturally. This is one of my voices, by the way. I am now speaking as someone who has lived most of his life in the West.

Incidentally, I think the term “West” does have some uses: It is not always to be dismissed as nonsensical (“there’s no such thing as the West”), but nor is it to be used in the slaphappy way many people use it when they say “the West has done this, the West has done that.” But I think the term has legitimate uses. Think of it this way:  if there are governments, if there are generals and politicians and bankers and even ordinary people like us, who talk about “the West”–on the European and North American continent–then there is a West. Because that is what our own activities presuppose. And in presupposing it, they partly create it, for good or for ill.

I say this because I am now talking to some extent to the West, to people in the West, whom one considers to be one’s cultural peers, one’s fellow citizens–regardless of whether they are hostile or friendly. That is part of it. I think it is important for me, certainly, to remember that one cannot or should not talk just as a “Muslim in Europe,” but also as somebody who is making a claim in the West on the West, in European countries and in the United States (as Tariq Ramadan has written). And in those situations I can talk about “we” even without any sense of incongruity.  

HA: The recent murders of ten journalists of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris have re-ignited fears vis-à-vis Muslims in Europe. Regarding the Danish cartoon controversy of 2005, in your article “Free Speech, Blasphemy, and Secular Criticism” (2009), you point to the problems with our secular rejection of transcendence, and the ways in which the arrogance of such assumptions are rooted in the secularization of the biblical injunction that the truth will free us. Are Muslims seen asblasphemers in relation to the proclamations of secularism?

TA: Let me first of all address the question of transcendence. The irony, it seems to me, is that although self-styled atheists say they reject “transcendence,” they are in fact subject (often willingly subject) to transcendent forces. Such as the transcendence of the market, which is a crucial part of modern capitalist society. And the transcendence of the state–the political form in which everyone lives in our world and makes absolute demands on our loyalty as citizens. And then of course there is the transcendence of “free speech.” In liberal society we claim that it is sacred and therefore has an absolute character. But we know (or should know) that “free speech” inhabits a structured space: not only is “hate speech” legally forbidden in liberal societies, but there are also laws protecting the circulation of copyrighted material, and the reproduction of trademarks and patents without explicit permission. And of course government secrets and commercial secrets cannot be breached without incurring severe penalties, which is an aspect of the transcendence of the modern sovereign state. I have discussed this point elsewhere and argued that there is a crucial distinction in liberal societies between the circulation of representations that are regarded asproperty and those that are not. Claims to the absoluteness of “free speech” are not very persuasive in this context.

Another, problematic example of “non-religious” transcendence is of course “humanity” and the worship it requires. And very closely connected with it is the modern notion of (cultural and moral) progress, which is assumed to be an open-ended movement that transcends all particularities, and stands over and above particular improvements of some particular state of affairs, the righting of something that is evidently wrong. To reject the transcendent progress of humanity is not necessarily to accept the status quo for what it is. So I think the different forms of transcendence need to be critically examined.

The notion of “humanity” as a form of transcendence derives, I think, from the conviction that intellectuality possesses an absolute power, from the demand that our best behavior depends on our ability to think abstractly, in terms of a universal rule, about something called humanity, that we need to understand humanity abstractly so that we can act responsibly towards those who represent it. But it seems to me perfectly possible to act humanely towards other beings, whether humans or animals or plants. One simply has to learn how to behave. To behave “humanely” it is perfectly possible to do without the notion of “humanity.” Language has multiple uses, and is embedded, as Wittgenstein pointed out, in different forms of life. It is not necessary to have this grand concept of “humanity” in order to behave decently. 

I recall, incidentally, a striking expression from al-Ghazali: “Ah, to have the faith of the old women of Nishapur!” which, as I understand it, is really a recognition of the importance of deep everyday faith, of apprehending transcendence not primarily with one’s intellect but in the way one lives one’s daily life.

You do not need intellectuality for deep faith. You do not need it for behaving humanely towards people whether fellow Muslims or non-Muslims. You do not need a concept, a theory, you do not need intellectual arguments for justifying a way of living that is already in place in order for it to proceed. Which is not to say you should neveremploy your intellect but only that it is not essential to exercise it in order to live a humane life. Language permeates all of life, of course, and one’s mind is essential to it, but that does not mean intellectualityshould transcend all of life.

For the law, the clarity of language and the finality of judgment is crucial, because you have to decide a case one way or another–whether it is criminal or civil or whatever. In ordinary life, you do not have to decide things with absolute finality. You do not have to decide on a theory in order to behave in a certain way towards other people. Of course, one needs clarity of language in all sorts of situations. Certainly in order to understand the natural world one needs clarity, logic, and the capacity for theory building. But that understanding tends to improve because and to the extent that it is provisional, hypothetical, when it looks for disconfirmation in the particular rather than final proof as a universal. The propensity to intellectualize is itself both essential and dangerous. I think in our modern world we are much more aware of its essential character than of its dangers, and that is why I think of it as being an expression of transcendence.

So let me turn to the question of blasphemy. People sometimes ask me: Are you willing to criticize religion? I would prefer to answer this question by looking at what people say and what they articulate, at how they live their life, and to the extent that the concept of religion is presented as itself transcendent, I think it is to be looked at critically and carefully.

In other words, I do not criticize religion as such, but I criticize the concept and the definition of “religion”–as I said in Genealogies. I am not looking for a better definition. I’m not criticizing how people experience what they might call spirituality. I am interested in looking critically at something else–at how people use their language to articulate theories about something they call religion, to say, for example, that “in Islam religion and politics necessarily go together,” or to insist that “violence has no place in religion,” to universalize it.

So transcendence is not entirely absent for people who are “nonreligious.” Indeed, I think that most of the things–not all–that such people accept as transcendent are dangerous, because they are damaging to thought and life.

HA: As I see it, part of the problem is the result of a reification of Islam; and I think Muslims are as guilty of this as their counterparts. Your 1986 essay “The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam” (republished in 2009), has played a significant role in reshaping scholarly discourse on Islam. You write that “Islam as the object of anthropological understanding should be approached as a discursive tradition that connects variously with the formation of moral selves, the manipulation of populations (or resistance to it), and the production of appropriate knowledges (10).” Can you describe for our readers how this approach may help us to de-reify Islam?

TA: First of all, in that paper I am talking about Islam as “an anthropological object,” that is as a way of approaching the question “What is Islam” more productively in anthropology.

Reification? It is worth thinking about why one uses the word “reification.” Reification means making something that was not a thing (but what is “a thing”?) into a thing. There are many philosophical theories of reification–especially Marxist theories of society and economy. When people say that Islam has been reified what do they mean?

I suppose one of the reasons people are suspicious of “reification” is that it implies a certain kind of closure, a certain kind of fixity and unchangeableness. What is one’s concern about the “reification” of Islam? Is it that the notion closes off the possibility of change and generalizes too much? In that case, what are the alternatives? How should one talk about it? This is why I think the approach to Islam as a tradition is helpful. Tradition helps us to focus on questions about authority and temporality, and about the language used in relation to the two. The idea of tradition helps us to understand the questions and arguments held to be important within a tradition, as well us to formulate productive questions about the tradition from outside. “Tradition,” in other words, can be made to yield a double sense: as a theoretical frame for asking questions, and as an empirical phenomenon to be described and analyzed even as it develops. 

As I have said, the question is how to approach the object of one’s enquiry. When speaking about Islam as a tradition one is not saying “All people do this, or believe this.” One is not saying that all people who identify themselves as Muslims do follow the Quran and hadith (or must follow them to be realMuslims). One is suggesting that there’s a certain kind of coherence–which may or may not be realized in particular situations–where people are trying to talk about Islam as a distinct intellectual object. I’m thinking about intellectuals, especially anthropologists, for whom this is an important concern. So how should one try to ask interesting questions about Islam as an anthropological object and not confuse that with “the reality” (actual experience) for different Muslims? How should one relate their sense of following or not, having “strong faith” or not, to authority and temporality.

By the way, I have increasingly preferred, for a number of years, to use the term “faithful,” wherever possible, instead of “believers.” This is basically whatmu’minin are, “the faithful,” rather than “believers,” a word that has acquired strong but often confusing modern senses. Believers are often thought of as people who have some kind of private conviction or repudiation of something, whereas  “the faithful” refers to a relationship, which was also incidentally the earlier sense of “faith” in premodern, preliberal Christianity. This is not to say, incidentally, that “faith” refers simply to external behavior as opposed to internal belief but that it refers to an act. Thus even if you think of the declaration of niyya when you say your prayers, that is in a sense itself a kind ofact, part of the tradition that you have to learn. By this I do not mean that it do not really have to be believed. It’s that one needs to get away from the modern idea of religious belief as something that is “purely private,” something one is entitled to hold–so long as it does not make (political) claims in the public sphere.

So, I think we need to think about Islamic tradition as a way of asking questions that cut across (and transgress) the assumptions of a purely secular world in which we already know how things stand for individual subjects as well as for societies. I think one must try and think of tradition in that way, as well as using it in other ways, as I have been using it, to describe empirically how some people follow such and such a tradition or don’t.

HA: What I am interested in examining in my own research is how competing discursive traditions within Islam (take Salafi and Sufi as two polar examples) interact with one another, thereby reshaping each other, without necessarily altering their core logics. In a similar vein, Islam and secularism (two other polar examples) have been reshaping each other–and continue to do so–for a very long time. Could you speak a little to the inner complexities of Islam as a group of competing “discursive traditions,” together with secularism being thrown into the mix?

TA: Well, I think that MacIntyre’s very fruitful discussion of tradition, which opened a whole new area of thinking about the world, and which I found very helpful in thinking about Islam. He talked about a living tradition being characterized by debate, and I found that crucial. To the extent that a tradition is a living tradition, and there is dispute within it–there is argument also as to what is essential to the tradition, to what belongs essentially to that tradition, to the way an account (whether oral or written) of behavior, attitudes, principles, etc., belongs or does not to that tradition, and to how its context is defined. I think that that notion is absolutely central. Arguments about which texts, accounts–other than founding discourses–belong or do not belong, can be drawn on or not because of the way they affect what the core of the tradition is, all that is absolutely central to what a living tradition is. And part of those arguments is of course over what is “secular” in an acceptable or unacceptable way. 

The notion that there is nevertheless something essential about a tradition is precisely what generates argument within a tradition, and it also provides the possibility of having conversations (not just arguments) both within given traditions as well as between them. Traditions such as the different schools (Hanafi, Shafi’i, Hanbali, Maliki and so on) and between Shia and Sunni, salafi and sufi, not only just intellectually to one another but also define themselves by reference to what they are not. (Which is why, incidentally, I find appalling the kind of mutual antagonism and violence that is occurring in so many Muslim countries.) But I am not sure I would describe all this, whether violent or not, as competition. Competition as a metaphor carries too much of a commercial load (accumulating profit, for example) that may misdirect one.

I am also not sure that the stereotypical contrast between salafi and sufi is always useful, if only because each of these terms has covered a number of shifting positions. “Salafis” in the Arabic speaking world at the end of the nineteenth century (such as Abduh) as opposed to “salafis” in early twenty-first century Egypt (influenced by wahhabism) are not the same. So too the different “sufi” brotherhoods. If salafis and sufis are polar opposites, how is one to understand Ibn Taymiyya, say, who is an important inspiration for contemporary salafis, and yet was the member of a tariqa?

Everyone, is to some extent placed, in one way or another, in what I have called a “narrative relation” to a tradition, for whom the continuity or disappearance of that tradition is either of importance or of indifference. So, I would say that “the religious” is involved precisely in attempts at either enriching or reforming a particular tradition in relation to the challenges it faces, or defending–or destroying–it. And those possibilities apply to “the secular” too. The secular is as much a part of the ensemble and the space of the spiritual as anything else–that is, “this world” is important to both in multiple ways. It is the attitude one has to this world, the way one inhabits it, that is sometimes confused with the question of belief (or disbelief) in “another world.”      

HA: The issue of being Muslim and being Othered in and by the West is a longstanding one. What I have recently been finding productive to think about is the ways in which Muslims themselves internalize this narrative of Otherness. What is the way forward for Muslims living in the West?

TA: The fact that one is an Other does not mean that no productive relationship can be had with the Other. I don not know that “internalizing” what “the West” says to/about one that is ipso a bad thing; it depends on how that internalization takes place, what it does to one. The question really is: Whether and if so to what extent and how is the Other connected to oneself.  

There is a thought provoking statement, not very well known, by Wittgenstein, where he says: “Tradition is not something a man can learn; not a thread he picks up when he feels like it; any more than a man can choose his own ancestors. Someone lacking a tradition who would like to have one is like a man unhappily in love.” Tradition is an aspiration to connect the Self with the Other. One “internalizes” the Other as one acquires a sense of what one’s own tradition is, what one belongs to and what gives valid shape to one’s life.

What is the way forward for Muslims living in the West? I do not think there is a single answer to that question because Muslims in the West are not a single homogeneous group, sociologically or theologically. Nevertheless they are seen, and will continue to be seen, as a minority within the Western nation state. And given the widespread violence perpetrated by heavily armed Western states and lightly armed jihadists (a symbiotic relationship if ever there was one) Muslim minorities in the West will continue to be the object of suspicion and discrimination. Our concern in this matter should not be to find someone to blame but to try to understand the limits of action facing Muslim minorities. The very common suggestion that Muslims should undertake a reform of their own religious tradition to help prevent “Islamic extremist violence” assumes that Muslims constitute a single political subject, that they are entirely self-contained, and that reform has not in fact been continuously undertaken in Islamic history. Those who urge theological reform to enable the effective condemnation of jihadism (especially after the Paris murders at Charlie Hebdoand the Jewish supermarket) should first inquire into the recency of this phenomenon: the Islamic tradition in all its variety has been around for centuries, and mainstream Muslim authorities have condemned such killing for ages. Why has the phenomenon of jihadism appeared–and proliferated–only now?

'The Idea of Islam Today: Towards Non-Orientalist Genealogies' 2014

American University of Beirut held an international symposium in honor of Talal Asad. Here is the keynote address.

The Idea of Islam Today: 
Towards Non-Orientalist Genealogies 

Organizers' opening remarks to the conference

An International Symposium in Honor of Talal Asad at AUB (9/2014)

This september witnessed a great celebration of Prof. Asad's works at AUB which will hopefully turn into a collection of essays.

The Idea of Islam Today: Towards Non-Orientalist Genealogies

An International Symposium in Honor of Talal Asad Inaugurating its new program in Islamic Studies, the AUB is hosting an international symposium in honor of Talal Asad entitled "The Idea of Islam Today: Towards Non-Orientalist Genealogies." Talal Asad is perhaps best known for his interventions in the anthropology of religion and secularism, but his theoretical reflections are not bound by disciplinary strictures. Encompassing texts and translation, law, ethics, war, history, political economy, humanitarianism, postcolonial studies, as well as contemporary politics, Asad’s work has been critical in shaping a generation of scholars from across the academy. As it celebrates the work of this inspiring scholar, the meeting aims to think through the idea of Islam in and from the region. For the full program click HERE

Reprint: The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam (2009 [1986])

Talal Asad's classic article The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam has ben reissued by Qui Parle (17:2)

DOWNLOAD

'Kinship' published in "Encyclopaedia of the Qur'an"

"Kinship" in Encyclopaedia of the Qur'an vol.3, ed. Jane Dammen McAuliffe, Brill 2003

DOWNLOAD

"Islam, Human Rights, and the Secular: A Conversation" Talal Asad and Abdullahi An-Na'im

Georgetown Uni., Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Talal Asad and Abdullahi An-Na'im
"Islam, Human Rights, and the Secular: A Conversation"

Listen the Talk


Can one ground universal human rights in the Islamic tradition? How do secular notions of human rights -- and those derived from other religious traditions -- compare with Islamic perspectives? Does the secular and democratic state pose a threat to Islam? Or might it in fact provide the best possible guarantee of the rights of Muslim citizens?.

Bibliography

Talal Asad
A Bibliography 

Compiled by Sheila Smyth 

up to '05, rest is mine [pdf]

2015

'Talal Asad Interviewed by Irfan Ahmad' Public Culture 2015, 27:2, 76: 259-279
Download

''Why do I support the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement?'' in Savage Minds by April 10th, 2015.
Read Here

Thinking About Tradition, Religion, and Politics in Egypt Today, Critical Inquiry [online]
Read Here

'Do Muslims Belong in the West' by Hasan Azad, Jadaliyye zine 2.3.2015
Read Here

2014

"Genealogies of Religion, Twenty Years On: An Interview with Talal Asad" by Craig Martin, Bulletin for the Study of Religion 43, no. 1 (2014): 12-17.
Download


2013

Asad, Talal, Wendy Brown, Judith Butler, and Saba Mahmood. Is critique secular?: blasphemy, injury, and free speech. Oxford University Press, 2013.
- chapters by Asad: ''Free Speech, Blasphemy and Secular Criticism'' and ''Reply to Judith Butler''

“Reflections on Violence, Law, and Humanitarianism,” Critical Inquiry Read Here [published in 2015]

"Neither Heroes, Nor Villains: A Conversation with Talal Asad on Egypt after Morsi" by Ayça Çabukçu in Jadaliyya e-zine, July 23, 2013 - Read Here / Arabic


2012

“Muhammad Asad Between Religion and Politics,” Islam and Science, Vol. 10, No. 1
Read Here

“Fear and the ruptured state: reflections on Egypt after Mubarak,” Social Research, vol. 79, no. 2.
Download

“Thinking about Religion, Belief, and Politics,” Robert Orsi, (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Religious Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Download


2011

“The Secular Body, Pain, and Liberal Politics,” Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 26, Issue 4
Download

"The Suspicious Revolution: An Interview with Talal Asad" by Nathan Schneider in Jadaliyya e-zine, August 21, 2011 - Read Here

''Cosmopolitanism and Peace'' [Review of Ghazi-Bouillan's 'Understanding the Middle East Peace Process'] in anthropology NOW 3, no. 1 (2011): 102-107.
Download

'Modernizing Middle Eastern Studies, Historicizing Religion, Particularizing Human Rights: An Interview with Talal Asad' by Janell Watson in the minnesota review 2011 Volume 2011, Number 77: 87-100
Download


2010

''Thinking about terrorism and just war'' Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Volume 23, Number 1, March 2010
Download

''A Colloquium on the Origin of Human Rights with Talal Asad'' at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, February 2, 2010 website

2009

Is critique secular?: blasphemy, injury, and free speech, Talal Asad. et al., University of California Press, 2009.
DOWNLOAD

read Gourgouris - Mahmood Debate here

"Response to Gil Anidjar," Interventions, Volume 11, Issue 3 November 2009 , pages 394 - 399
WEB

see Anidjar's article in the same issue 

“The Idea of an Anthropology of Christianity” (on Talal Asad) 

''The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam'' republished in Qui Parle Vol. 17, No. 2 link

''Religion, law, and the politics of human rights: Talal Asad and Abdullahi An-Na’im in conversation'' SSRC September 29, 2009 - Read Here

2008

عن التفجيرات الانتحارية [On Suicide Bombing in Arabic]

"Interview" in the section 'Secularism and Islam', The Present as History: Critical Perspectives on Global Power, edited by Nermeen Shaikh, published by Columbia UP, 2008. (video)

"Historical notes on the idea of secular criticism" published in The Immanent Frame
Read Here


2007
On Suicide Bombing (The Wellek Library Lectures), Columbia University Press, 2007
Spanish, Japanese,

Google Books

The creation of terror and the perpetration of atrocities are aspects of militant action in the unequal world we inhabit, of our notions of what is cruel and what is necessary, and of the emotions with which we justify or condemn particular acts of death-dealing. I do not plead that terrorist atrocities may sometimes be morally justified. I am simply impressed by the fact that modern states are able to destroy and disrupt life more easily and on a much grander scale than ever before, and that terrorists cannot reach this capability. I am also struck by the ingenuity with which so many politicians, public intellectuals, and journalists provide moral justifications for killing and demeaning other human beings. This book does not pretend to offer solutions to moral dilemmas about institutionalized violence. It makes no case for accepting some kinds of cruelty as opposed to others. Its hope, rather, is to disturb the reader sufficiently so that he or she can take a distance from the complacent public discourse that pre-packages moral responses to "terrorism," "war," and "suicide bombing." (from the introduction)

"Secularism, hegemony, and fullness" [a response to Charles Taylor's A Secular Age] published in The Immanent Frame Read Here





2006

Powers of the secular modern: Talal Asad and his interlocutors
Edited By David Scott, Charles Hirschkind
Stanford University Press, 2006
Google Books

Table of Contents

1	Introduction : the anthropological skepticism of Talal Asad	1
2	Secularization revisited : a reply to Talal Asad	12
3	What is an "authorizing discourse"?	31
4	Fasting for Bin Laden : the politics of secularization in contemporary India	57
5	Europe : a minor tradition	75
6	Secularism and the argument from nature	93
7	On general and divine economy : Talal Asad's genealogy of the secular and Emmanuel Levinas's critique of capitalism, colonialism, and money	113
8	The tragic sensibility of Talal Asad	134
9	Redemption, secularization, and politics	154
10	Subjects and agents in the history of imperialism and resistance	180
11	Responses	206
App	The trouble of thinking : an interview with Talal Asad	243
	Talal Asad : a bibliography	333

宗教を語りなおす―近代的カテゴリーの再考、みすず書房、2006年 (modern reconsideration of the category of religion)

“Trying to Understand French Secularism.” Political Theologies. Ed. Hent de Vries. New
York: Fordham University Press, 2006. Forthcoming in November 2006.
DOWNLOAD

''A Single History?'' at Open Democracy
READ

Penser la terreur, l’horrible et la mort : entretien avec Talal Asad
DOWNLOAD


2004

“Where Are the Margins of the State?” The State and its Margins. Eds. Veena Das and Deborah Poole. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 2004. 279-288.

Asad, Talal, and Keishi, Nakamura. Shukyo no keifu: kirisutokyo to isuramu ni okeru kenryoku no konkyo to kunren. Tokyo: Iwanamishoten, 2004. Note: In Japanese.


2003

Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003. Note: Translations contracted with publisher - Italian, Turkish, Arabic, and Japanese.

Google Books

Table of Contents
What might an anthropology of secularism look like? -- Thinking about agency and pain -- Reflections on cruelty and torture -- Redeeming the “human” through human rights -- Muslims as a “religious minority” in Europe -- Secularism, nation state, religion -- Reconfigurations of law and ethics in colonial Egypt.

“Crusading Peace: Christendom, the Muslim Worlds, and Western Political Order.” History of Religions 42.3 (2003): 249-52.
DOWNLOAD

“Boundaries and Rights in Islamic Law: an Introduction.” Social Research 70.3 (2003): 683-686.
DOWNLOAD


2002
“Muslims and European Identity: Can Europe Represent Islam?” The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union. Ed. Anthony Pagden. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 2002. 209-227.

“Ethographic Representation, Statistics, and Modern Power.” From the Margins: Historical Anthropology and its Futures. Ed. Brian Keith Axel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002. 66-91.
DOWNLOAD

Asad, Talal, Dabashi, H., et al. “Statement Protesting the Sentenced Execution of Professor Hashem Aghajari.” Social Research 69.4 (2002): 9-13.
READ

“Some Thoughts on the WTC Disaster.” ISIM Newsletter 9 (2002): 1; 38.
DOWNLOAD


2001

''Thinking about Secularism and Law in Egypt''. Leiden, Holland: International Institute for the Study of Islam in the Modern World (ISIM), 2001.
DOWNLOAD

Asad, Talal, Harvey, D., et al. “Local Horror: Global Response.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25.4 (2001): 901.
DOWNLOAD

“Reading a Modern Classic: W.C. Smith's ‘The Meaning and End of Religion.” History of Religions 40.3 (2001): 205-222.
DOWNLOAD
Note: Reprinted in Religion and Media, Eds. Hent de Vries and Samuel Weber. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001.


2000

“Agency and Pain: An Exploration.” Culture and Religion 1.1 (2000): 29-60.
Reprinted in the Formations of the Secular, ch.2
Download

“What Do Human Rights Do? An Anthropological Enquiry.” Theory and Event 4.4 (2000).
Download



1999

“Religion, Nation-State, Secularism.” Nation and Religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia. Eds. Peter van der Veer and Hartmut Lehmann. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999. 178-196.
DOWNLOAD

1997

“Remarks on the Anthropology of the Body.” Religion and the Body: Comparative Perspectives on Devotional Practices. Ed. Sarah Coakley. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
DOWNLOAD

Asad, Talal., et al. “Provocation of European Ethnology.” American Anthropologist 99.4 (1997): 713.
DOWNLOAD

“Europe Against Islam: Islam in Europe.” Muslim World 87.2 (1997): 183-95.
Note: First published in Dutch in Nexus 10 (1994).
DOWNLOAD

1996

“Comments on Conversion.” Conversion to Modernities: The Globalization of Christianity. Ed. Peter van der Veer. New York: Routledge, 1996. 263-273.

“Honor - Stewart, FH.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 116.2 (1996): 308-9.
DOWNLOAD

“On Torture, or Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment.” Social Research 63.4 (1996): 1081-1109.
DOWNLOAD
Note: Reprinted in Human Rights, Culture & Context, edited by Richard Wilson, London: Pluto Press, 1997; and in Social Suffering. Eds. Arthur Kleinman, Veena Das, and Margaret Lock. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997.


1995

“A Comment On Translation, Critique, and Subversion.” Between Languages and Cultures: Translation and Cross-Cultural Texts. Eds. A. D. Needham and C. Maier, Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press, 1995. 325-332.
DOWNLOAD

“Ideology and Cultural Identity: Modernity and the Third World Presence – Larrain, J.” American Ethnologist 22.4 (1995): 1013-14.
DOWNLOAD


1994

“Ethnographic Representation, Statistics and Modern Power.” Social Research 61 (1994): 55-88.
DOWNLOAD

1993

Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam.
Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.
INTRODUCTION
Japanese 

Table of Contents

	Introduction	1
	Genealogies
1	The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category	27
2	Toward a Genealogy of the Concept of Ritual	55
	Archaisms
3	Pain and Truth in Medieval Christian Ritual	83
4	On Discipline and Humility in Medieval Christian Monasticism	125
	Translations
5	The Concept of Cultural Translation in British Social Anthropology	171
6	The Limits of Religious Criticism in the Middle East: Notes on Islamic Public Argument	200
	Polemics
7	Multiculturalism and British Identity in the Wake of the Rushdie Affair	239
8	Ethnography, Literature, and Politics: Some Readings and Uses of Salman Rushdie's Satanic Verses	269
	References	307
	Acknowledgments	325
	Index	327

“A Comment On Aijaz Ahmad's In Theory.” Public Culture 6.1 (1993): 31-39.
Download


1992

“Religion and politics: An introduction”, Social Research, 59(1), 3
Download

“Conscripts of Western Civilization?” Dialectical Anthropology: Essays in Honor of Stanley Diamond, vol. 1, Ed. C. Gailey. Gainesville, FL: University Presses of Florida, 1992. 333-351.
Download


1991

“From the History of Colonial Anthropology to the Anthropology of Western Hegemony.” Colonial Situations: Essays on the Contextualization of Ethnographic Knowledge. Ed. George Stocking. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991. 314-324.
DOWNLOAD


1990

“Multiculturalism and British Identity in the Wake of the Rushdie Affair.” Politics & Society 18.4 (1990): 455-80.
DOWNLOAD

“Ethnography, Literature, and Politics: Some Readings and Uses of Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses.” Cultural Anthropology 5.3 (1990): 239-269.
DOWNLOAD


1988

“Towards a Genealogy of the Concept of Ritual.” Vernacular Christianity: Essays in the Social Anthropology of Religion Presented to Godfrey Lienhardt. Eds. W. James and D. Johnson. New York: Lilian Barber Press, 1988. 73-87. 1987

“Are There Histories of Peoples Without Europe?” Comparative Studies in Society and History 29.3 (1987): 594-607.
DOWNLOAD

“Ritual and Discipline in Medieval Christian Monasticism.” Economy and Society 16.2 (1987): 159-203.
DOWNLOAD

1986

Asad, Talal, Georgetown University, and Center for Contemporary Arab Studies. “The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam.” Occasional Papers. Washington, D.C.: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, 1986.
DOWNLOAD / Arabic

“Medieval Heresy: An Anthropological View.” Social History 11.3 (1986): 345-62.
DOWNLOAD

“The Concept of Cultural Translation in British Social Anthropology.” Writing Culture. Eds. Clifford, James and George E. Marcus. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1986.
EXCERPT

1985

With J. Dixon. “Translating Europe's Others.” Europe and Its Others. Eds. F. Barker et al. Colchester, UK: University of Essex Press, 1985.


1984

“Primitive States and the Reproduction of Production Relations.” On Social Evolution: Contributions to Anthropological Concepts Held on the Occasion of the 50th Anniversary of the Wiener Institut Institut für Völkerkunde in Vienna, 12th-16th December 1979. Ed. Walter Dostal. Vienna. Horn: F. Berger, 1984.


1983

Asad, Talal and Roger Owen. The Middle East. London, UK: MacMillan, 1983.
amazon

“Notes on Body Pain and Truth in Medieval Christian Ritual.” Economy and Society 12.3 (1983): 287-327.

“Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz.” Man 18.2 (1983): 237-259.
DOWNLOAD

1982

“Slaves of the White Myth: the Psychology of Neocolonialism - Gladwin, T.” Man 17.1 (1982): 193-4.
DOWNLOAD

Review of ''The Middle East: An Anthropological Approach by Dale F. Eickelman'' in International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Feb., 1982), pp. 102-103
DOWNLOAD


1981

“Ideology, Class and the Origin of the Islamic State.” Economy and Society 10.4 (1981): 498-9.
DOWNLOAD

“Palestinian Society and Politics - Migdal, JS.” Political Studies 29.2 (1981): 317.

Review of Two Works: "The Origins of the Economy - Pryor; Research in Economic-Anthropology, vol 1, 1978 – Dalton, G.” in Third World Quarterly 3.2 (1981): 334-6.
DOWNLOAD


1980

“Indigenous Anthropology in Non-Western Countries: A Further Elaboration,” Current Anthropology 21, no. 5 (1980): 661–63; as “A Comment on the Idea of a Non-Western Anthropology,” in Indigenous Anthropology in Non-Western Countries: Proceedings of a Burg Wartenstein Symposium, ed. Hussein Fahim (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1982), 284–88.
DOWNLOAD

With R. Owen. “The Critique of Orientalism: A Reply to Professor Dodd.” British Society for Middle Eastern Studies Bulletin 7.1 (1980): 33-38.
DOWNLOAD

“Ideology, Class and the Origin of the Islamic State.” Economy and Society 9.4 (1980): 450-473. DOWNLOAD
Note: Translated into Arabic and republished in Al-Mustaqbal Al-Arabi, 22. (1980).

Remarks on Edward Said's Orientalism in the 'Short Notices' section, The English Historical Review, Vol. 95, No. 376 (Jul., 1980), pp. 648
DOWNLOAD

1979

“British Social Anthropology.” Towards a Marxist Anthropology: Problems and Perspectives. Ed. Stanley Diamond. New York: Mouton, 1979. 367-376.
DOWNLOAD

“Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter.” Politics of Anthropology: From Colonialism and Sexism Toward a View from Below. The Hague: Mouton, 1979. 85-97.
DOWNLOAD

“Anthropology and the Analysis of Ideology.” 14.4 Man (1979): 607-627.
DOWNLOAD
Note: Translated into Italian and reprinted in Materiali Filosofici. 3 (1980).

1978
“Equality in Nomadic Systems?” Critique of Anthropology (1978).
Note: Reprinted in Pastoral Production and Society. Eds. Equipe Ecologie et Anthropologie des Societes Pastorales. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
DOWNLOAD



1977

“A Village in Upper Egypt.” Gazelle Review of Literature on the Middle East (1977): 82. 1976
DOWNLOAD

“The British Mandate.” MERIP Reports 53 (1976): 3.

Asad, Talal, Cunnison, Ian, and Lewis G. Hill. “Settlement of Nomadism in the Sudan: A Critique of Present Plans.” Some Aspects of Pastoral Nomadism in the Sudan.[s.l.]. Sudan National Population Committee and the Economic and Social Research Council, 1976. 174-192.

With H. Wolpe. “Concepts of Modes of Production.” Economy and Society 5.4 (1976): 470-506.

"Politics and Religion in Islamic Reform: a Critique of Kedourie's Afghani and Abduh." Review of Middle East Studies 2 (1976).

1976

"Class transformation under the mandate." MERIP Reports (1976): 3-23.
DOWNLOAD

1975

“Anthropological Texts and Ideological Problems: An Analysis of Cohen on Arab Villages in Israel.” Economy and Society 4.3 (1975): 251-282.  
DOWNLOAD

Note: Reprinted as “Class Transformation of Palestine Under the Mandate” in MERIP Reports, December l976.
DOWNLOAD


“The Rise of Arab Nationalism: A Comment.” Israel and the Palestinians. Eds. U. Davis, Andrew Mack and Nira Yuval-Davis. London, UK: Ithaca Press for the Richardson Institute and the Issues Programme at the University of Bradford, 1975. 93-96.
DOWNLOAD


1974

“The Concept of Rationality in Economic Anthropology.” Economy and Society 3.2 (1974):211-218.

"Marx and Mill: Two Views of Social Conflict and Social Harmony - Duncan, G." Man 9.4 (1974): 640.


1973

Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. London, UK: Ithaca Press, 1973.
Türkçe,

"Arab Village: Social Structural Study of a Trans-Jordanian Peasant Community - Antoun, RT." Man 8.2 (1973): 328-329.
DOWNLOAD

“Equality and Inequality in Islam.” Man 8.2 (1973): 305-6.
DOWNLOAD

“Note on Spirit-Possession Among the Kababish.” Sudan Society (1973).

“The Bedouin as a Military Force: Notes on some aspects of power relations between Nomads and Sedentaries in Historical Perspective.” The Desert and the Sown: Nomads in the Wider Society. Ed. Cynthia Nelson. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies, University of California, 1973. 61-73.
DOWNLOAD

“Two European Images of Non-European Rule.” Economy and Society 2.3 (1973): 263-277. DOWNLOAD
Note: Reprinted in Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. New York: Humanities Press, 1973.


1972

“Market Model, Class Structure and Consent: a Reconsideration of Swat Political Organization.” Man 7.1 (1972): 74-94.
DOWNLOAD
Note: Reprinted in The Anthropology of Politics: A Reader in Ethnography, Theory, and Critique. Ed. Joan Vincent. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.

“Political Inequality in the Kababish Tribe.” Essays in Sudan Ethnography: Presented to Sir E. Evans-Pritchard. Eds. I. Cunnison and W. James. London: England, 1972.
DOWNLOAD

“On the Frontiers of Islam: Two Manuscripts Concerning Sudan Under Turco-Egyptian Rule, 1822-1845 - Hill, R.” Africa 42.2 (1972): 169-70.
DOWNLOAD


1971

“Shaykh and Effendi: Changing Pattern of Authority among El Shabana of Southern Iraq - Fernea, RA.” Man 6.1 (1971): 144-5.
DOWNLOAD


1970

The Kababish Arabs: Power, Authority and Consent in a Nomadic Tribe. London, UK: Hurst & Co., 1970. Excerpts from Introduction and Conclusion

“Studies in Social History of Modern Egypt – Baer, G.” Sociology 4.3 (1970): 408.

“Sudanese Ethics - Nordenstam, T.” Africa 40.1 (1970): 85-86.
DOWNLOAD

“The Memoirs of Babikr Bedri – Bedri, Y and Scott, G.” Africa 40.2 (1970): 185-186
DOWNLOAD

“Universities in Arab World: French - Waardenburg, JJ.” Sociology 4.3 (1970): 433-4.


1968

The Kababish. Oxford, England: University of Oxford. Doctoral Dissertation, 1968. WEB

Talal Asad University of Oxford. Faculty of Anthropology and Geography.

Thesis (D.Phil.)--University of Oxford, 1968. 1968 iv, 397 leaves, [4] leaves of plates (2 folded) : geneal. tables, maps, photos., ports. ; 27 cm. 

“Bedouin of Negev - Marx, E.” African Social Research 6 (1968): 492-3.


1966

“A Note on History of the Kababish Tribe.” Sudan Notes and Records 47 (1966):79-87.


1965

Review: Buurri al Lamaab by Harold B. Barclay in Sudan Notes and Records Vol. 46, (1965) , pp. 167-170
Download


1964

"Seasonal Movements of the Kababish Arabs of Northern Kordofan." Sudan Notes and Records 45(1964): 48-58.
Download 

Note: Reprinted in Peoples and Cultures of the 

Middle East: an Anthropological Reader, vol. 1, 

Ed. by L. Sweet. Garden City, New York: Published for the 

American Museum of Natural History Press, 1970.

1960

“Definition of Marriage.” Man 60 (1960): 73-74.
DOWNLOAD

Works Edited by Talal Asad

Full-time joint editor (1974-92) of Economy and Society. Routledge. London, UK.

Founded and edited, together with Roger Owen, the first three volumes (1975-8) of the Review of Middle East Studies. London: Ithaca Press.

Guest editor of the special issue of Social Research on “Politics and Religion” 59.1 (1992). New School for Social Research, New York.

فكرة انثروبولوجيا الإسلام - طلال أسداد

فكرة» انثروبولوجيا الإسلام

طلال أسد
تعريب: أبو بكر باقادر

1986 Article ''The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam'' in Arabic